<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: MacBook Pro Firmware Update Fixes Battery Issues</title>
	<atom:link href="http://fairerplatform.com/2013/02/macbook-pro-firmware-update-fixes-battery-issues/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://fairerplatform.com/2013/02/macbook-pro-firmware-update-fixes-battery-issues/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=macbook-pro-firmware-update-fixes-battery-issues</link>
	<description>Apple news, views and reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 19:12:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Henry</title>
		<link>http://fairerplatform.com/2013/02/macbook-pro-firmware-update-fixes-battery-issues/#comment-35809</link>
		<dc:creator>Henry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2013 21:27:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fairerplatform.com/?p=21642#comment-35809</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Do the math.  If I bought an &quot;early 2010&quot; when it first came out, and discharged and recharged the battery COMPLETELY, EVERY DAY between then and now, I would just about be passing 1,000 charge cycles.  That is, assuming I hadn&#039;t replaced the battery long ago for being worn out an refusing to hold a charge.  I think I can safely say that this is indeed a molehill.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do the math.  If I bought an &#8220;early 2010&#8243; when it first came out, and discharged and recharged the battery COMPLETELY, EVERY DAY between then and now, I would just about be passing 1,000 charge cycles.  That is, assuming I hadn&#8217;t replaced the battery long ago for being worn out an refusing to hold a charge.  I think I can safely say that this is indeed a molehill.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
