Home » Mac, Reviews, how to

12-Core Mac Pro Posts 33K Genchbench Score

13 January 2014 448 views One Comment

Apple previewed the Late 2013 Mac Pro for developers in June, introduced it to the public in October and then delivered it to users on December 30, but the surprises just keep coming and nearly all to the good. This groundbreaking desktop — trashcan? Vader’s helmut? — is unconventional in the extreme.

Apple has locked down more and more of its products in recent years. However, the late 2013 Mac Pro is easy to repair and very upgradable — two things that neither the critics nor fan boys expected in a such a small, highly engineered package.

Likewise, the reviews have been stellar and, no matter how you spin the numbers, the Mac Pro is a better value than any comparable off-the-shelf or DIY Windows PC.

The last piece of the puzzle, performance, has now fallen nicely into place.

While prerelease 12-core Mac Pro benchmarks came in less than stellar, the latest Geekbench numbers are much more impressive — a multiprocessor score of nearly 33,000, besting 2012′s best, put up by a cheese grater Mac Pro, by about 6,000 points or 22 percent.

Previous numbers were generated by a not fully 64-bit version of Primate Labs’ Geekbench. So, not only are the Late 2013 Mac Pro performance metrics better, but so are the numbers notched by the 2012 cheese grater.

On the hardware side, Apple has produced an excellent pro grade desktop computer. Now, Apple and third-party software developers need to step and deliver fully 64-bit, multiprocessor optimized, OpenCL ready apps…

Now are you ready to a Late 2013 Mac Pro?

Related Posts:
— Refurbished Macs: $849 MBA; $999 MBP; $1,049 iMac; $2,139 Mac Pro
— 2013 iMac vs Mac Pro: 4-Core Shoot Out
— Apple Explains ‘Using the Late 2013 Mac Pro on Its Side’
— 2013 Mac Pro Porn: Unboxing
— How To: Replace OS X Trash Can with a Trash Can Mac Pro

One Comment »

  • Christian Aust said:

    I do qualify as a fanboy, but still I don’t get it. The numbers show: More cores are more good. So what? The 4-core Mac Pro is beaten by the 4-core Haswell iMac, what does that tell us? The Mac Pro sure is nice and everything and boy I’d love to have one on my desk. But am I willing to shell out a 25% premium to go for “Pro”? Not sure man.

Leave your response!

Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site. You can also subscribe to these comments via RSS.

Be nice. Keep it clean. Stay on topic. No spam.